<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tamiyablog&#8217;s photos from the Nuremberg Fair</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tamiyablog.com/2010/02/tamiyablogs-photos-from-the-nuremberg-fair/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tamiyablog.com/2010/02/tamiyablogs-photos-from-the-nuremberg-fair/</link>
	<description>a blog about tamiya rc and static kits, from vintage classics to future releases</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 18:00:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bram</title>
		<link>http://tamiyablog.com/2010/02/tamiyablogs-photos-from-the-nuremberg-fair/comment-page-1/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>Bram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 04:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamiyaforum.com/?p=218#comment-194</guid>
		<description>Tamiya screwed the Datsun by NOT making an accurate steel wheel, instead they used the multi-lugs military look wheels from the Humvee. Looks like a scaler project gone bad. It&#039;s very un-Tamiya, since Tamiya mostly made a manufacturer specific looking wheels for most of their RC cars. But a swap to 26mm HPI stock car wheels should do the trick :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tamiya screwed the Datsun by NOT making an accurate steel wheel, instead they used the multi-lugs military look wheels from the Humvee. Looks like a scaler project gone bad. It&#8217;s very un-Tamiya, since Tamiya mostly made a manufacturer specific looking wheels for most of their RC cars. But a swap to 26mm HPI stock car wheels should do the trick <img src='http://tamiyablog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cessna</title>
		<link>http://tamiyablog.com/2010/02/tamiyablogs-photos-from-the-nuremberg-fair/comment-page-1/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Cessna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 01:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamiyaforum.com/?p=218#comment-172</guid>
		<description>Nice. But I like RC Airplane.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.makeplane.com/2010/01/cessna-150-flying-between-buildings-and.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here&lt;/a&gt; I flying between buildings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice. But I like RC Airplane.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.makeplane.com/2010/01/cessna-150-flying-between-buildings-and.html" rel="nofollow">Here</a> I flying between buildings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wild Willy Sammler</title>
		<link>http://tamiyablog.com/2010/02/tamiyablogs-photos-from-the-nuremberg-fair/comment-page-1/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>Wild Willy Sammler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamiyaforum.com/?p=218#comment-169</guid>
		<description>nice article about the sand sorcher:&lt;br /&gt;http://www.blick.ch/auto/auto/der-buggy-lebt-139940</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice article about the sand sorcher:<br /><a href="http://www.blick.ch/auto/auto/der-buggy-lebt-139940" rel="nofollow">http://www.blick.ch/auto/auto/der-buggy-lebt-139940</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tamiyablog.com</title>
		<link>http://tamiyablog.com/2010/02/tamiyablogs-photos-from-the-nuremberg-fair/comment-page-1/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>tamiyablog.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamiyaforum.com/?p=218#comment-167</guid>
		<description>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porsche_935#935.2F78_.22Moby_Dick.22</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porsche_935#935.2F78_.22Moby_Dick.22" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porsche_935#935.2F78_.22Moby_Dick.22</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://tamiyablog.com/2010/02/tamiyablogs-photos-from-the-nuremberg-fair/comment-page-1/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamiyaforum.com/?p=218#comment-166</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the answers about the Unimog.&lt;br /&gt;About the Porsche 935/78, what is &quot;Moby Dick&quot;? (didn&#039;t see this name in the original kit 24010)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the answers about the Unimog.<br />About the Porsche 935/78, what is &quot;Moby Dick&quot;? (didn&#39;t see this name in the original kit 24010)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miramar</title>
		<link>http://tamiyablog.com/2010/02/tamiyablogs-photos-from-the-nuremberg-fair/comment-page-1/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>miramar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 05:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamiyaforum.com/?p=218#comment-165</guid>
		<description>Just a small correction to the CR-01 bodies on the CC-01 chassis comment; the wheelbase of the CR-01 chassis is the same regardless of having the Landcruiser, Unimog, Wrangler or Bronco body. However, the bodies themselves don&#039;t have exactly the same wheelbase. The wheelbase of the Landcruiser body is 252mm, which necessitates the mentioned new parts on the Landcruiser bodied CC-01 (58445) to get a &quot;medium wheelbase&quot;. The Unimog body however has a 242mm wheelbase, so it fits exactly right on the regular &quot;short wheelbase&quot; CC-01, so only new body mounts are needed to fit a Unimog body from the CR-01 onto a &quot;short wheelbase&quot; CC-01. For using the Unimog body on a &quot;long wheelbase&quot; CC-01 chassis (Touareg and CR-V), the short prop-shaft would be needed too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a small correction to the CR-01 bodies on the CC-01 chassis comment; the wheelbase of the CR-01 chassis is the same regardless of having the Landcruiser, Unimog, Wrangler or Bronco body. However, the bodies themselves don&#39;t have exactly the same wheelbase. The wheelbase of the Landcruiser body is 252mm, which necessitates the mentioned new parts on the Landcruiser bodied CC-01 (58445) to get a &quot;medium wheelbase&quot;. The Unimog body however has a 242mm wheelbase, so it fits exactly right on the regular &quot;short wheelbase&quot; CC-01, so only new body mounts are needed to fit a Unimog body from the CR-01 onto a &quot;short wheelbase&quot; CC-01. For using the Unimog body on a &quot;long wheelbase&quot; CC-01 chassis (Touareg and CR-V), the short prop-shaft would be needed too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tamiyablog.com</title>
		<link>http://tamiyablog.com/2010/02/tamiyablogs-photos-from-the-nuremberg-fair/comment-page-1/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>tamiyablog.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 07:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamiyaforum.com/?p=218#comment-164</guid>
		<description>Thanks you, the CR-01 main lexan bodies are basically the same with the ones used at the CC01 versions, but the new CC01s have a different wheelbase, so you must use some new extra chassis parts, check the online manuals.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Regards,&lt;br /&gt;Admin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks you, the CR-01 main lexan bodies are basically the same with the ones used at the CC01 versions, but the new CC01s have a different wheelbase, so you must use some new extra chassis parts, check the online manuals.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />Admin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://tamiyablog.com/2010/02/tamiyablogs-photos-from-the-nuremberg-fair/comment-page-1/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 03:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamiyaforum.com/?p=218#comment-163</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the great photos.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Can the Unimog body in the CR-01 version be converted for use on the CC-01 chassis? (got a Unimog CR-01 and also a CC-01 chassis, wonder if they can be compatible)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;um, the 1:1 Sand Scorcher, I love it ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great photos.</p>
<p>Can the Unimog body in the CR-01 version be converted for use on the CC-01 chassis? (got a Unimog CR-01 and also a CC-01 chassis, wonder if they can be compatible)</p>
<p>um, the 1:1 Sand Scorcher, I love it <img src='http://tamiyablog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://tamiyablog.com/2010/02/tamiyablogs-photos-from-the-nuremberg-fair/comment-page-1/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 23:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamiyaforum.com/?p=218#comment-162</guid>
		<description>Any pics of the TRF511 LiPo Tray?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any pics of the TRF511 LiPo Tray?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miramar</title>
		<link>http://tamiyablog.com/2010/02/tamiyablogs-photos-from-the-nuremberg-fair/comment-page-1/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>miramar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 13:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamiyaforum.com/?p=218#comment-159</guid>
		<description>@ Great Dane,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;thanks a lot for the friendly comments! &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We are also happy to see the Unimog, but its release was to be expected after the release of the FJ40 on the CC-01&quot;M&quot; chassis, so we weren&#039;t surprised by that one. And we fully agree about the steering system. It was pretty poor by current standards at the time of the release and meanwhile the design is almost 20 years old! Also, I personally would have prefered if the gearbox housing had been a separate part and not molded in one part together with the tub. That said, we all love the CC-01 and any new model that indicates that its lifespan will be expended is highly welcome.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We agree about the MiTo too, which is a reason we posted several pics of it. A surprising release we think!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As for the 240Z Safari, my own first encounter with the static Tamiya kit was in the early &#039;70&#039;s at an age just getting into plastic models and still playing with diecast cars. At that time, I didn&#039;t an urge to get this model, but I indeed dreamed of having an equally detailed diecast car in a scale appropriate for my small hands at that time. Needless to say, I stored away a NIB kit of an original release version of the Tamiya kit some years ago, but the RC version is a long time dream come true, and totally eclipsing the existent ABC body of the same car.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As for the MAN truck, we didn&#039;t hav a clue either. A new truck model was to be expected as Tamiya has quite strong traditions for presenting new (tractor-)truck models in Nuremberg.  For the same reason, we expected a new body for the CR-01, but then again, in recent years Tamiya has presented a lot less new items in Nuremberg than they usually do on the Shizuoka fair in May, so there is surely a lot great items to come this year!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Regarding your comment about no 1/8 electric buggy, we reckon that can be confirmed. As far as we know, the current list in the blogentry below and the pics in this entry cover the majority of new Tamiya items in Nuremberg and at least the highlights, and we don&#039;t expect to have any further surprises up the sleeve by the end of today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Great Dane,</p>
<p>thanks a lot for the friendly comments! </p>
<p>We are also happy to see the Unimog, but its release was to be expected after the release of the FJ40 on the CC-01&quot;M&quot; chassis, so we weren&#39;t surprised by that one. And we fully agree about the steering system. It was pretty poor by current standards at the time of the release and meanwhile the design is almost 20 years old! Also, I personally would have prefered if the gearbox housing had been a separate part and not molded in one part together with the tub. That said, we all love the CC-01 and any new model that indicates that its lifespan will be expended is highly welcome.</p>
<p>We agree about the MiTo too, which is a reason we posted several pics of it. A surprising release we think!</p>
<p>As for the 240Z Safari, my own first encounter with the static Tamiya kit was in the early &#39;70&#39;s at an age just getting into plastic models and still playing with diecast cars. At that time, I didn&#39;t an urge to get this model, but I indeed dreamed of having an equally detailed diecast car in a scale appropriate for my small hands at that time. Needless to say, I stored away a NIB kit of an original release version of the Tamiya kit some years ago, but the RC version is a long time dream come true, and totally eclipsing the existent ABC body of the same car.</p>
<p>As for the MAN truck, we didn&#39;t hav a clue either. A new truck model was to be expected as Tamiya has quite strong traditions for presenting new (tractor-)truck models in Nuremberg.  For the same reason, we expected a new body for the CR-01, but then again, in recent years Tamiya has presented a lot less new items in Nuremberg than they usually do on the Shizuoka fair in May, so there is surely a lot great items to come this year!</p>
<p>Regarding your comment about no 1/8 electric buggy, we reckon that can be confirmed. As far as we know, the current list in the blogentry below and the pics in this entry cover the majority of new Tamiya items in Nuremberg and at least the highlights, and we don&#39;t expect to have any further surprises up the sleeve by the end of today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
